What is osteoporosis?
Osteoporosis is a systemic condition
characterized by low bone mass and deterioration of the microarchitecture of
the bone. This can lead to bone fragility and the increase risk of fractures.
Figure
1 Comparing the microarchitecture of bone in normal vs osteoporosis
patients.
How to diagnose and measure osteoporosis
One thing doctors can do is to measure the
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) of the bone using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
(DXA). The lower a person’s BMD means a higher risk of fractures.
T-scores and Z-scores are used to express
and measure a person’s severity of bone
loss and thus used to diagnose osteoporosis. The T-score is the number of
standard deviations(SD) away from the mean BMD of an adult aged 30 years old.
According to the World Health Organization(WHO) criteria, diagnosis of
osteoporosis can be made based on a patient’s T-score.
Table 1 Interpretation of T-scores according to the WHO criteria
T
score
|
Interpretation
|
-1 and or above
|
Normal
|
Between -1 and -2.5
|
Osteopenia
|
-2.5 or lower
|
Osteoporosis
|
Z-scores are used to assess patients
younger than 50 years of age as the score represents the number of SD away the
patient is from age and sex matched mean BMD.
Prompt investigation is required with a Z-score under -2.
Risk factors for Osteoporosis and what can you do to
reduce it
There have been a multitude of risk factors
that contribute to osteoporosis. It has been established that some medications
can increase a patient’s risk of bone fractures and cause osteoporosis. On the
other hand, some constitutional factors such as the female gender, aging as
well as race increase patient’s risks too.
Fortunately there are also life style and
nutritional factors one can modify to help reduce the risk of osteoporosis and
fractures. Studies have shown that smoking, excessive alcohol consumption and
lack of physical activity increases the risk of patients getting fractures.
Therefore by exercising more, smoking less
and drinking less one can reduce the risk of fractures. Patients can improve
their hand eye co-ordination, balance and muscle strength through exercising.
This greatly reduces the risk of falls and thus is a great preventer for
fractures. Weight bearing exercises have also demonstrated to increase BMD in
some instances.
Health supplements such as calcium and
vitamin D are essential for bone health. According to the Australian
Therapeutic Guidelines (TG), approximately 1300mg of calcium as well as maintaining
a level of 25-OH vitamin D above 75nmol/L is crucial for the prevention and
maintenance treatment of osteoporosis.
Treatments available for osteoporosis in Australia
Table 2 Summary of available treatment for osteoporosis in Australia
Medication
|
How
it works
|
Benefits
|
Cons
|
Special
consideration
|
Bisphosphonate
Alendronate (oral)
Risedronate (oral)
Zoledronic Acid (IV)
|
Decrease bone resorption(bone loss)
|
First line therapy to treat osteoporosis.
Flexible dosing schemes such as once daily, weekly or
monthly.
IV bisphosphonates are only a once yearly dose
|
Associated with oesophagitis and in worse cases of
oesophagel ulceration. Osteonectrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a rare but serious
documented side effect of bisphosphonates.
|
Oral bisphosphonate therapy requires the patient to stay
upright for 30 mins after ingesting to reduce risk of oesophagitis.
See your
dentist before starting bisphosphonates.
|
Raloxifene
|
Selective
Oestrogen Recptor Modulator that
provides the benefits of oestrogen to the bones while reducing the risk of
breast cancer associated with oestrogen supplementation
|
Less risk of
breast cancer compared to HRT.
|
Equal risk of
DVT compared to HRT supplementation.
Less
beneficial than bisphosphonates and HRT individually.
Only
effective in reducing fractures on the vertebrae.
|
|
Strontium
ranelate
|
Increase bone formation and decrease bone resorption
|
Well established evidence in reducing vertebral fractures
in women.
|
Increase risk of VTE.
|
Previously only approved for female patients, now
approved for both men and women.
Take at night time.
Avoid taking strontium and calcium together as it affects
its absorption.
|
Denosumab
|
Decrease bone
resorption and loss by inhibiting RANKL.
|
New therapy
with a completely new mechanism of action.
Injections
come once every 6 months.
Great results
directly comparable to alendronate.
|
Not much
evidence is documented regarding its side effect.
Long term
safety profile is not well established.
|
One case
reporting of ONJ.
Consult
dentist for checkup before starting therapy.
|
Hormone
Replacement Therapy (HRT)
|
Oestrogen effects from HRT helps reduce bone loss.
|
Increases the risk of breast cancer as well as stroke,
heart diseases and blood clots
|
Lacking evidence of long term benefits past 5 years of
HRT.
|
|
Teriparatide
|
Increases
bone formation.
|
Only therapy
that actively increases bone formation.
|
Only reserved
for patients who cannot tolerate all the other therapies.
Increases the
chance of getting bone sarcoma (cancer).
Never use in
patients under 25 years old.
|
Maximum life
time exposure of 18 months (1.5 years)
Only a
specialist may initiate this therapy.
|
What is Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ)? What can be done
about it?
Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (ONJ) is a rare
but serious complication associated with bisphosphonate usage. Although it is
prevalently warned to all patients on bisphosphonates, it has mainly been seen
in patients receiving intravenous bisphosphonates who also underwent dental
surgery during the treatment.
It seems that ill fitting dentures as well
as performing dental extractions during bisphosphonate treatment are major risk
factors of developing ONJ.
It is recommended to patients to have a
thorough dental examination prior to commencing bisphosphonates. Doctors should
also ensure patients have all necessary extractions and surgery performed prior
to commencing bisphosphonates to reduce the risk of bisphosphonate related
osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ).
The reason why this is recommended is
because the drug is absorbed into the bone and can have lasting effects from 1
to 10 years. It is unclear if stopping bisphosphonates before planned dental
extractions would reduce the risk of BRONJ, but it is prudent to do so.
If dental extraction is absolutely
necessary, the C-terminal telopeptide (CTX) concentration is a good indicator
to determine whether it is safe to perform dental surgery. CTX is a breakdown
product of bone resorption, and thus its concentration give doctors a good idea
of bone turnover. A normal concentration of CTX is around 400-500 picograms/mL.
If the CTX concentration in the patient is
more than 150 picograms/mL, dental surgery can safely proceed. If it is less
than 150 picograms/mL, the patient will need to cease bisphosphonates temporarily.
Usually CTX levels increase by 25 picograms/mL every month after ceasing
bisphosphonates. By monitoring CTX levels, practitioners can determine the
length of time the bisphosphonate needs to be ceased before starting dental
surgery.
Bisphosphonates can then be resumed 10 days
after the extraction.
Note: While the new medicine denosumab is
not a bisphosphonate, there has been an incidence of ONJ occurring during
treatment. Prescribers are also recommended to exercise the same level of
caution and recommendations as for patients on bisphosphonate therapy, and
ensure all necessary dental work is completed before starting denosumab.
References:
- Therapeutic Guidelines - Endocrinology. 4th edition. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guideline limited; 2009.
- Osteoporosis microarchitechture comparison [image on the Internet]. 2013 [updated 15 Sep 2013; cited 16 Sep 2013]. Available from: http://physioworks.com.au/injuries-conditions-1/osteoporosis#
- Australian Medicines Handbook. 2013 edition. Adelaide: Pharmaceutical Society of Australia; 2013. pg 419-435
- Denosumab (Prolia) for postmenopausal osteoporosis. NPS RADAR[serial online]. 2010 Dec [cited 16 Sep 2013]; Available from http://www.nps.org.au/publications/health-professional/nps-radar/2010/december-2010/denosumab
- Therapeutic Guidelines - Oral and Dental. 2nd edition. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guideline limited; 2012. pg.152-156
No comments:
Post a Comment